[ad_1]
Is there such a factor as an excessive amount of display screen? Clearly, sure. Strive plonking, say, a 65-inch HDTV in your desktop as PC monitor and the constraints of dimension are apparent sufficient. However the unbelievable, preposterous new Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 G95NC Twin UHD is not any thinly disguised TV. It is a correct PC-optimised panel. And but this 57-inch uber-wide monster nonetheless has us questioning when you can have an excessive amount of of factor.
What you are , in impact, is a pair of 32-inch 240Hz 4K gaming displays fused right into a single 57-inch ultra-curved panel. So, that is no fewer than 7,680 by 2,160 pixels, or simply over 16.5 million in whole and twice that of 4K. Ouch.
A single 240Hz 4K monitor could be fairly particular. However double that decision working at such a excessive refresh price is genuinely unprecedented. Certainly, it is so novel that solely AMD’s newest RDNA 3-powered Radeon RX 7000 Collection GPU can hit the total 240Hz courtesy of their DisplayPort 2.1 interfaces. Nvidia’s RTX 40-series GPUs are restricted to DP 1.4 can solely do 120Hz.
In fact, you may argue that is normally going to be a tutorial distinction. Good luck hitting 240Hz at twin 4K in Cyberpunk with all of the ray-tracing twangers maxed out, or some other graphically demanding recreation, even on an RTX 4090. Nonetheless, it is undoubtedly a bit problematic that this most demanding of PC displays cannot run at full efficiency with the present world’s quickest GPU. Should you can afford this monitor’s $2,499 sticker worth, you possibly can nearly actually afford to go all in on a $1,599 RTX 4090.
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 G95NC
Display screen dimension: 57-inch
Decision: 7680 x 2160
Brightness: 420 nits “typical”
Shade protection: 95% DCI-P3
Response time: 1ms
Refresh price: 240Hz
Distinction ratio: 2500:1
Options: VA panel, adaptive sync, 1x DisplayPort 2.1, 3x HDMI 2.1, USB-C hub, 1000R curve
Value: $2,499 | £2,199
Anyway, this show has a couple of further metrics and options which can be value noting. For starters, there’s DisplayHDR 1000 certification. With that comes full-array native dimming and a couple of,392 zones, which not surprisingly is double what you get on many 32-inch 4K panels with full-array dimming. Once more, it is that dual-4K factor.
The panel itself is VA, which is what you’d anticipate from Samsung, although the two,500:1 static distinction ranking is somewhat decrease than you may anticipate, given VA panel tech can now obtain 3,000:1 and even 4,000:1. For the file, pixel response is rated at 1ms and thus on par with most high-performance LCD-based gaming displays. Oh, and miles off the 0.1ms and even decrease response scores of the most recent breed of OLED panels.
Anywho, out of the field this factor is laugh-out-loud giant. We’re used to Samsung’s 49-inch G9s right here at PCG Towers, such because the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC, however in some way this 57-inch monster remains to be surprising. It is the mixture of the massive panel dimension, the ridiculous 32:9 side ratio and excessive 1000R curvature. You are feeling such as you’re getting your cash’s value that is for certain. Styling and ergonomics-wise, it is the same old Samsung Odyssey fare full with that signature Stormtrooper shiny white plastic.
Out of the field this factor is laugh-out-loud giant.
As for connectivity, together with the DisplayPort socket that solely provides the total 240Hz, there is a trio of HDMI inputs, plus USB-C. Nonetheless, the latter is just for the USB hub, it isn’t a show interface.
However what of the particular viewing expertise? First impressions are of a monitor that, if something, comfortably exceeds the claimed brightness ranking. Samsung quotes 350 nits minimal and 420 nits typical for SDR content material, however this monitor is well punchier than your standard 400 nit panel.
HDR efficiency is past the HDR1000 certification, too. In HDR check video, it is clearly able to past 1,000 nits of brightness. Really, you possibly can see that in video games, too. Pan the digital camera as much as the sky and the desert solar in Cyberpunk 2077 and the panel completely sizzles. HDR video content material appears to be like spectacular, too.
There are limitations, after all. Even with a few thousand dimming zones, the backlight decision could be very low. And you’ll see that when you look rigorously at HDR content material. An apparent instance is a small brilliant object on a darkish background, which is probably not sufficient to set off the backlight to ramp up, leaving it darker than it needs to be. The problems transcend that, however more often than not, the backlighting precision limitations are pretty refined.
What’s extra, Samsung has lastly sorted out the way to deal with SDR content material in HDR mode. You now not have any backlighting weirdness with SDR content material, it simply works like a standard show with out native dimming, which is a reduction.
Certainly, throughout our time with the show, we did not see any of the glitches and bugginess which have blighted Samsung’s massive Odyssey gaming LCDs of late. So, that is progress of kinds.
What we did see and what actually marks this show out is the elevated pixel density on an epic scale. The 140DPI is precisely the identical as a 32-inch 4K monitor, it is simply you have by no means seen this type of pixel density on such a big panel earlier than. It truly is outstanding to expertise this type of picture element throughout such an enormous monitor.
That stated, it is questionable how a lot you actually discover this in-game versus on the desktop. At regular recreation viewing distances, the heightened picture element is unquestionably there. It is simply not tremendous apparent versus Samsung’s smaller (when you can name 49 inches small) and decrease decision G9 displays. So, the humorous factor in regards to the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 G95NC is that it is at its most interesting as an all-round PC monitor relatively than as a pure gaming panel.
It is so good to have crisp, clear fonts on a monitor this dimension. That is one thing you completely do discover subsequent to the opposite G9 panels. For multi-tasking, it is a pleasure too. As for watching video and flicks, nicely, the plain drawback is that there is no 32:9 content material. Typical 16:9 video leaves half the panel unused and even anamorphic 2.39:1 ultrawide characteristic movies depart respectable sized black bars both aspect of the content material.
Anyway, again to gaming and thank goodness for contemporary upscaling. The twin 4K decision provides even a Radeon 7900 XTX a hammering. To be trustworthy, even with upscaling, that GPU cannot address Cyberpunk 2077 with ray tracing enabled. Much less demanding titles look slick, clean and completely spectacular. However these 16 million pixels are debilitating for any GPU to drive, there is no getting spherical that.
It is at its most interesting as an all-round PC monitor relatively than as a pure gaming panel.
A method of constructing sense of this ridiculous display screen goes like this. Pay your cash and pair it with an RTX 4090. You may get respectable body charges in most video games, espeically with upscaling. The 120Hz limitation is not really a lot of a limitation since you’ll not going to be hitting 240fps at max particulars in The Final of Us: Half 1, or no matter, at dual-4K anyway.
Then when much more highly effective new GPUs are launched subsequent yr or possibly 2025, they’re going to probably have DP 2.1 and be able to the total 240Hz. And you can hit that 240Hz-plus extra usually in additional goes. And away you go. It is hardly a price proposition. However then when you’re contemplating a $2.5k gaming monitor, that is in all probability not an enormous concern.
What may fear you is the comparability with Samsung’s personal 49-inch ultrawide OLED displays, the Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G93SC and G95SC. These screens are somewhat bit cheaper and run at a a lot decrease 5,120 by 1,440 decision. As an alternative of being primarily two 32-inch 4K displays fused into one, these OLED displays are two 27-inch 1440p panels in a single.
So, you do not get something just like the pixel density, crispness and sharpness with the OLED different. The searing brightness is not on supply, both. However you do get outrageously quick pixel response and ideal per-pixel lighting for a really immaculate HDR expertise and immense distinction.
Picture 1 of 2
In fact, the ultrawide 32:9 side is shared by all the Samsung G9 displays. And it is debatable how a lot profit that’s to gaming. For absolute certain, it is improbable for that wrap-around really feel of immersion. However most first-person shooters, particularly esports titles, do not assist it correctly in FoV phrases, so you find yourself with plenty of stretching and distortion on the edges.
The visible ergonomics by way of UI components with such an enormous, ultrawide display screen are problematic, too. Having to crane your neck dramatically, simply to glimpse your minimap or well being standing is not precisely ergonomic. Immediately, it appears like a number of video games want configurable UI to make them snug and intuitive to play.
It is onerous to attract a very definitive conclusion in regards to the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 G95NC, then. It is costly sufficient to be irrelevant to most avid gamers, on the one hand. And it has apparent limitations. But it surely additionally delivers an expertise no different monitor can match.
OLED tech, as an example, clearly provides superior velocity and ideal per pixel lighting that can by no means be matched by an LCD monitor with a flowery backlight. However there is no OLED gaming monitor that may match this monster’s pixel density, particularly as such scale.
In different phrases, as epic as this monitor is, it does nothing to alter the truth that nobody monitor can at the moment supply the most effective in present show tech.
Purchase if…
✅ You need the final word gaming spectacle: By no means earlier than has this type of pixel density been out there from such an enormous display screen. It is unbelievable.
Do not buy if…
❌ You are anticipating perfection: Samsung has improved its native dimming implementation. But it surely’s nonetheless no match for the lighting precision—and pixel response—of an OLED monitor.
Someday, you can have a monitor with actually punchy full-screen brightness, per-pixel lighting, ultra-fast response, and real high-DPI pixel density in any dimension or form you fancy. However proper now, it’s important to compromise on one or two gadgets from that listing, it is simply not potential to mix the whole lot in a single show.
What which means is it’s important to resolve whether or not you worth what this show does greatest over the alternate options. If you would like that crispy pixel density and punchy brightness on a scale by no means seen earlier than, there’s nothing that may contact this monitor. However, arguably, what this display screen does greatest is definitely productiveness, particularly once you issue within the picture-by-picture assist.
The superior pixel density is admittedly apparent in Home windows, however much less so in video games. On the similar time, the ultra-high decision generates sufficient GPU load to make the 240Hz refresh relatively tutorial with a number of trendy video games. That is significantly true given Nvidia’s RTX 4090 can solely do 120Hz in any case on account of its old-spec DisplayPort interface.
For pure gaming, then, there are in all probability higher optimised choices. However as an all-round, ultra-luxury, money-no-object PC monitor, that is pretty much as good because it at the moment will get, flaws and all.
[ad_2]
Source link
